seo_usa_logo

+8801786190537

24/7 Customer Support

The Burlingame Endgame Murders Dilemma: What Really Happened to American Airlines Flight 77?

Times have changed a lot and this applies to communication as extremely well. Now, you can merely get in contact with anyone you desire through the find email address contact information by name technology email database. The best way will be always to search your email accounts because nonetheless might carry the email address of your acquaintance. May think that have received a mail-in firearm control past. May call any relative within the person whose email ID you need to uncover his email. However, if such work does not yield any results, as well as reverse email, the lookup is the best option.The idea is that the coupon is valid only for the next 5 minutes. You could even have a countdown that shows the coupon slowly expiring. With your it all the more urgent that your potential customer now does what they have to do and can make the purchase, may after your own the ultimate goal with any sales pitch. The fundamental step in creating your individual mail address is to join up a unique domain concept. A domain name is actually an internet address by which people reach their own.

The Burlingame Endgame Murders Dilemma: What Really Happened to American Airlines Flight 77?

The old mystery conundrum, “Who killed Cock Robin?”, has promoted the creation of many attractively scheming works of literary fiction over the last two centuries in which the creative authors have endeavored to give the human mind puzzling homicide scenarios to contemplate with the hope of solving. While a great many Americans spend countless hours of their time reading Agatha Christie, James Patterson, Dashiell Hammett, and the numerous other contemporary writers of murder mysteries, some grotesque real-life homicides, faa employee count -plus, were committed on September  , of deductive reasoning and sound forensic investigation to solve. Sixty-four of those murders might be case-filed under the name, “The perplexing Burlingame Endgame Murders,” named after the command pilot of the American Airlines Flight  , and the fifty-eight passengers, and other five members of the crew, on-board the Boeing  , and, of course, that intriguing final part of a chess game that always demands an extra-special attention to detail which, according to the federal government, was allegedly flown into the west wall of the Pentagon at allegedly

My thought processes were acutely stimulated recently while listening to the Larry O’Connor Show, on WMAL,   FM, on Tuesday September  During that radio show, I was intrigued, if not very puzzled, by the statements of Debra Burlingame, the younger sister of the deceased Flight   pilot, Charles Burlingame, about what supposedly happened on September 11, 2001, at the Pentagon. Debra, supposedly a veteran lawyer, has, since  continually parroted the federal version of what happened to Flight  scheduled American Airlines Boeing  jet flight from Washington, DC to Los Angles, California being hijacked in-flight and flown by the high-jacker, Hanjour, into the Pentagon, insisting that her brother, and the other  crew and passengers who were listed on an American Airlines Flight  manifest, were killed when the jet airliner made impact with the Pentagon’s western wall at, supposedly,  mph at about 60 feet above the ground. What is utterly baffling about these alleged facts is why Debra has supported, for nearly sixteen-years, a series of assertions about the death of her dear brother, which could not have possibly occurred due to scientific impossibility.

See also  Mailing Lists - The Two Kinds of Lists and Two of the Best Places to Purchase Them

Since 9/11, many scientifically “correct” facts about what “really” happened at the Pentagon on that awful day have emerged from thorough forensic and scientific examinations and analyses of the dubious facts alleged by the federal government immediately after the Pentagon incident and, later, in its published  -plus page tome, “The Report of  Commission.” As a former deputy sheriff for the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, I graduated from the 72nd San Diego County Sheriff’s Academy in June  after an intense exposure to criminal forensics. Before that, I had studied inorganic chemistry for one year in an engineering program at Tyler Junior College (TJC), in Tyler, Texas, and, after completing a baccalaureate degree at U.T. Tyler, I completed my first, and only, year of law school at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, in San Diego, California. Later, in 1992, I took an M.A. Degree from the University of Texas at Tyler, which included a graduate-level course in forensic chemistry. Hence, I came to view the events, and federally alleged facts, at the Pentagon with the eyes of a suspicious forensically trained cop, which led me to see a completely different set of facts, as I will set forth in this article.

Invariably, when large military or commercial jet aircraft crash into mountains, into the ground, and into buildings and skyscrapers the crashes of these airplanes leave a great deal of wreckage, especially engine component wreckage. The composite structure of a Boeing  contains ten-tons of titanium and steel engine components, which should have been quite visible after such an aircraft crashed into the western wall of the Pentagon, and the damaging impact of those engine parts should have caused the grassy well-kept grounds around, and near, the crash site to be greatly disturbed, gouged, and plainly messed-up. Yet, the facts show that the first media news crew to arrive at the Pentagon site directly after the alleged crash, a CNN news-crew presented a seventy-second broadcast wherein the CNN reporter, Jamie McIntyre, stated that he “did not see a crashed Boeing  jet airliner on the west side of the Pentagon, where the wall was damaged.” He had flatly stated that “if there was a crash of a large jet, it must have been short of the Pentagon, for the wreckage that is on the Pentagon grounds must have been that belonging to some type of much smaller aircraft.” In the news-clip, McIntyre looked plainly confused, and that seventy-second broadcast via CNN was never again shown on national television on, or after, 9/11. Thank goodness for the invention of the DVR, for if recording devices across the nation, in the living rooms of millions of television watchers, had not been running at that moment, that television broadcast segment would have been lost to history, and, in all probability, the existence of it would have been denied by CNN and the federal government. Jamie McIntyre’s subsequent denial, in  , of what he had reported seeing at the Pentagon came in early  , when concerned citizens who had seen and heard his short-lived news-flash began questioning the federally alleged facts. The denial by McIntyre about what he had seen and heard on the morning of   was clearly coerced through some type of intimidation; as much as was the  denial statement of U.S. Air Force Major Jesse Martel, the Air Force intelligence officer who had first stated that he had clearly seen the remains of a crashed flying saucer near Roswell, New Mexico. He had later confessed that had been ordered by a commanding Air Force general to appear in an officially published Air Force picture and say that what he had seen was from the crash of a weather balloon, instead of what he had really seen. A movie was subsequently made about Martel’s denial, featuring Martin Sheen as a reporter who had found and interviewed Jesse Martel at an Army Air Corps reunion.

See also  Ways to Acquire Opportunity Seeker Leads

 

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.